Cartiva Implant Lawsuit: A Comprehensive Guide (2025)
Contributor
Reviewed By Adam Ramirez, J.D.
Editor
The world of orthopedic medicine continuously seeks advancements to bring relief and improved quality of life to patients. Among such developments is the Cartiva implant, a prosthetic device designed for patients suffering from joint issues, particularly in the foot. However, an onslaught of Cartiva lawsuits in recent years shows growing safety concerns.
The Cartiva implant, which was designed as a synthetic replacement for the degraded cartilage in the big toe, has been marketed by the implant maker, Stryker, for its high patient satisfaction rate. However, a typical Cartiva implant lawsuit shows that many patients seem to be dissatisfied and are demanding financial compensation for the suffering and complications caused by implant failure.
Patients who had undergone the Cartiva implant insertion procedure and subsequently suffered a failure of the implant are filing lawsuits against Stryker alleging that the manufacturer did not warn them about the increased risk of implant failure. As Cartiva implants fail prematurely, the number of Cartiva implant lawsuits could increase significantly over the next months and years, not to mention that the individual lawsuits could be consolidated into a Cartiva implant class action lawsuit.
If you had a Cartiva implant inserted into your toe and suffered complications due to implant failure, you could be entitled to financial compensation like hundreds of other patients who received Cartiva toe implants to treat arthritis. Our team at ConsumerShield is ready to discuss your experience with the implant and the potential Cartiva implant lawsuit. Fill out our ‘Contact Us’ form to speak with us.
Lawsuit Updates
- Significant Interest for Cartiva Implant Lawsuits
Free Cartiva Implant Lawsuit Case Review!
By clicking “SUBMIT”, I consent to be contacted by, or on behalf of, ConsumerShield or its trusted legal partners, including for marketing purposes, via the contact information I have provided. I understand that my consent is not a condition of purchasing any goods or services, and that message and data rates may apply. I have the right to opt out of text messages at any time by texting STOP. Additionally, you will be contacted by an attorney.
TRUSTED BY THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS NATIONWIDE |
As seen on:
What is the Cartiva Implant Lawsuit?
A Cartiva implant is a synthetic cartilage device that is biomechanically engineered to mimic the function of natural cartilage. It is commonly used to treat osteoarthritis in the big toe, a condition known as hallux rigidus, where the cartilage wears out and leads to joint pain and stiffness.
An estimated 40% of the U.S. population have some kind of foot problems, according to a 2017 study published in the National Library of Medicine. Hallux rigidus affects an estimated 2.5% of Americans over the age of 50.
Unlike traditional treatments that often involve fusing bones to alleviate pain, the Cartiva implant allows for more movement and quicker recovery times. The implant is made of a biocompatible, durable material that provides a low-friction surface, aiming to reduce pain while maintaining joint mobility. It is small and round, similar to the size of a jellybean, and is inserted into the joint space after damaged cartilage has been removed.
History of The Cartiva Implant
The Cartiva implant, manufactured and sold by Stryker, was developed as an alternative to more invasive procedures that restrict movement. Over the years, it has become a preferred treatment option for its design focusing on preserving joint motion. The implant received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2016 after clinical trials demonstrated its ability to reduce pain and improve physical function for patients with osteoarthritis in the toe.
How Effective and Safe Is the Cartiva Implant?
The summary of safety and effectiveness data issued by the FDA in 2016 revealed that nearly 89% of Cartiva subjects experienced a significant decrease in pain and 87.7% of the subjects had a clinically significant increase in function.
However, Stryker obtained FDA approval for the Cartiva toe implant through the pre-market approval process, which is considered a shortcut to approval that evades a comprehensive review by the federal agency.
The effectiveness and safety of the Cartiva implant have come under increased scrutiny as a large number of users reported high failure rates caused by implant shrinkage and migration. Concerns over device safety have been seen in other cases, such as Hernia Mesh lawsuits, where patients experienced severe complications due to device failure. Plaintiffs in a typical Cartiva implant failure lawsuit allege that Stryker suppressed facts from both the public and the FDA about problems with the implant to minimize the actual failure rate.
Why Do Cartiva Implants Fail?
Like any medical device, Cartiva implants come with the risk of complications or failure. Some reasons for implant failure include:
- The development of scar tissue around the implant, which can restrict movement;
- Shrinkage of the implant due to the lack of hydration;
- Infection around the implant site;
- Implant dislocation or loosening, potentially caused by high-impact activities or improper placement during surgery;
- Bone weakening around the implant; and
- Continuous pain post-surgery, which could indicate that the body is not responding to the implant as expected.
When these issues occur – specifically implant shrinkage and loosening – patients are likely to suffer debilitating pain and serious nerve damage. This may require a patient to undergo an additional surgery to remove or replace the implant. In some patients, Cartiva implant failure may also result in complications such as infections, osteolysis, cysts, bone over-production, and other problems.
If a patient experiences symptoms of Cartiva implant failure, they should consult their orthopedic surgeon to discuss treatment options, which may include removal or replacement of the implant. If the failure was caused by Stryker’s failure to disclose the known risks of the implant or other forms of negligence on the part of the manufacturer, you could be entitled to financial compensation through a Cartiva toe implant lawsuit.
Can You File a Cartiva Lawsuit?
Patients who have experienced significant complications or failures with their Cartiva implants may consider legal action against Stryker. Grounds for a Cartiva implant lawsuit could include:
- Faulty implant design
- Inadequate warnings or instructions provided with the implant
- Manufacturing defects
If you believe your complications are due to one of these issues, you should seek legal advice from a lawyer experienced in drug and medical device litigation. A lawyer can offer guidance on your rights and potential next steps, including the possibility of receiving compensation for medical costs, pain, and suffering resulting from a failed implant.
Cartiva Implant Failure Symptoms (2025)
The Cartiva Implant Lawsuit has brought to light a multitude of serious complications that patients have experienced following the implantation of the Cartiva device. Despite the initial promise of the implant as a revolutionary solution for big toe arthritis, the reality has proven far less rosy for many patients.
One of the most common complications reported is severe and persistent toe pain, which not only limits the mobility of patients but also significantly impacts their quality of life. This pain is often a result of the implant loosening within the joint or fracturing, both of which can cause the joint to fail.
Subsidence, a condition in which the implant sinks into the bone, has also been frequently reported. This can result in further pain and necessitate additional surgeries to correct the issue.
More worryingly, some patients have reported nerve damage and debilitating pain due to the Cartiva implant shrinking once implanted. This shrinkage can cause the implant to migrate from its original position, leading to serious complications.
Toe Pain
One of the most common complications reported is severe and persistent toe pain, which not only limits the mobility of patients but also significantly impacts their quality of life. This pain is often a result of the implant loosening within the joint or fracturing, both of which can cause the joint to fail.
Subsidence
Subsidence, a condition in which the implant sinks into the bone, has also been frequently reported. This can result in further pain and necessitate additional surgeries to correct the issue.
Nerve Damage
More worryingly, some patients have reported nerve damage and debilitating pain due to the Cartiva implant shrinking once implanted. This shrinkage can cause the implant to migrate from its original position, leading to serious complications.
Additional complications reported in the lawsuit include infections, implant fracture, osteolysis (the destruction or disappearance of bone tissue), bone over-production, cysts, and silastic granulomas. These complications often necessitate further surgeries, increasing the patient's suffering, medical costs, and recovery time.
At ConsumerShield, we believe that patients deserve justice and compensation for these complications. We meticulously connect individuals with our network of skilled lawyers, handpicked for their expertise in class action lawsuit claims like the Cartiva Implant Lawsuit. Our commitment goes beyond just making connections. We provide a partnership in your journey towards justice, offering guidance and support every step of the way.
Several studies that have raised concerns about the Cartiva implant's efficacy and safety:
- November 2022 Study: Preliminary findings of an ongoing study published in a medical journal found that patients who received the Cartiva toe implant reported more post-operative pain. The study reviewed 50 patients who underwent Cartiva hemiarthroplasty, arthrodesis (fusion of the joint), or interpositional arthroplasty. It found that Cartiva patients reported a worse overall combination of postoperative pain, function, and alignment compared to patients who received the alternative treatments.
- October 2020 Study: A study published by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society indicated a high failure risk for patients receiving Cartiva implants for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Within two years of receiving the implant, there was a 79% implant failure risk. Furthermore, 64% of patients who received a Cartiva implant experienced device failure within four weeks of the surgery. The most commonly reported reason for Cartiva failure was subsidence, where the implant loosened and sank into the toe bone, resulting in severe toe pain and revision surgery in some cases.
- October 2019 Study: Researchers from Cedar Sinai Hospital found that 30% of Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant (SCI) recipients were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the outcomes of the procedure. The study found 50% required a corticosteroid injection after receiving the implant. The researchers concluded that the Cartiva implant only yielded modest patient satisfaction, with a large proportion requiring further treatment and workup postoperatively.
If you or a loved one has experienced any of these complications following the implantation of the Cartiva device, reach out to ConsumerShield. We're here to help you understand your rights and to support you in your claim for compensation. You do not have to navigate this complex legal landscape alone. With ConsumerShield, you have a partner committed to helping you seek the justice you deserve.
Cartiva Implant Lawsuit Knowledge Base
Read the latest information on Cartiva Implant Lawsuit and find answers to your questions. Currently there are 4 topics about Cartiva Implant Lawsuit Lawsuits.
Settlements & Payouts
How to File
Frequently Asked Questions
-
The longevity of the Cartiva implant can vary from patient to patient. It depends on several factors, including the patient's overall health, activity level, and how well the body accepts the implant. However, numerous reports of early failure have surfaced, prompting lawsuits against the manufacturer.
-
The problem with the Cartiva implant, as alleged in numerous lawsuits, is a higher-than-expected failure rate leading to severe complications such as persistent pain, loosening or fracturing of the implant, subsidence (where the implant sinks into the bone), and other issues that necessitate additional surgeries.
-
Eligibility to participate in the Cartiva Implant Lawsuit is typically determined on a case-by-case basis. However, generally, you may be eligible if you or a loved one have had a Cartiva implant and subsequently experienced complications such as persistent pain, loosening or fracturing of the implant, subsidence, or other issues that necessitated additional surgeries. To find out if you qualify, it's best to consult with a legal professional. ConsumerShield can connect you with experienced attorneys who can evaluate your situation and determine your eligibility.
-
To join the Cartiva Implant Lawsuit, start by reaching out to a legal professional who specializes in such cases. At ConsumerShield, we can connect you with experienced attorneys who can evaluate your case, determine your eligibility, and guide you through the process of joining the lawsuit.
-
The potential compensation from the Cartiva Implant Lawsuit can vary widely depending on the specifics of your case. Factors such as the severity of your complications, the cost of your medical treatment, the impact on your ability to work, and the degree of pain and suffering you've endured can all affect the potential compensation. Legal professionals can provide an estimate based on these factors.
